CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
VS
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8100 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3392 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 230W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 8100
+2153%
10.75 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 8100
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
Graphics Card
Dec 2017
Release Date
Jul 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
448bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
24
56
Compute Units
-
3584
Shading Units
192
224
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Vega 10
GPU Name
GT200B
Vega 10 XL (215-0894216)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B3
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
230W
TDP
182W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI Radeon HD 5750 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
2
NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
3
AMD Radeon 780M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
4
AMD FirePro W7100 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
5
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
6
AMD Radeon HD 7750 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
7
AMD Radeon R7 260X vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
8
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100 vs NVIDIA P104 100
9
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100 vs NVIDIA P104 101
10
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100 vs MTT S70
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy