Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI FireMV 2250

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 230W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Jan 2007
Radeon Pro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
-
224
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
32W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
RV516
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.0
Architecture
R500
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
UMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy