Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 9100 and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 9100 +31412%
12.29 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2017
Release Date
Jan 2011
Radeon Pro
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
64bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
24.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
18W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GT218
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy