Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs AMD FirePro W4300

AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 240 OEM and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock780MHz
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 240 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300 +138%
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Dec 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Bonaire
-
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy