Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 240 OEM and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 204W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 240 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition +18%
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Jan 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
384
Shading Units
240
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
204W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy