Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7950

AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 340 OEM and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon HD 7950 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 36.80GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 340 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950 +378%
2.867 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2012
Pirate Islands
Generation
Southern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
36.80GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1792
24
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.867 TFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Tahiti
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy