Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 340 OEM and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5700 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 130W)
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 92% (1499MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 36.80GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 340 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5700 XT +1181%
7.675 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Aug 2020
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
1243 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1499 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
36.80GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
95.94 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
239.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.35 TFLOPS
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.675 TFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
479.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
130W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Navi 10
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
Navi 10 XTA
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy