Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 340X OEM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 340X OEM
0.691 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 +312%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2020
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
TU117
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy