Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 340X OEM and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 340X OEM
0.691 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800 +2478%
17.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jun 2021
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2075 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2320 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
60
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
3840
24
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
222.7 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
35.64 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.82 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1114 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Navi 21
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy