Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 340X OEM and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 340X OEM
0.691 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X +492%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Oct 2013
Pirate Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
32
384
Shading Units
2048
24
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Tahiti
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy