Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 340X OEM and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 8800 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 220W)
AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock2430MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.1GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 340X OEM
0.691 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 8800 XT +2781%
19.91 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Pirate Islands
Generation
Navi IV(RX 8000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1295 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2430 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2438 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
624.1GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
64
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
233.3 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
622.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.81 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.91 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
622.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
220W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Navi 48
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
Unknown
77 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy