Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 340X OEM and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Dec 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
392 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.54GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
-
-
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
RV530
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
RV530 LE
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy