Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 435 OEM and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2016
Release Date
Jan 2007
Arctic Islands
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
-
20
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

8.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
20.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
659.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
41.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Hainan
GPU Name
RV516
-
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.69 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
56 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy