Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 A255 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

AMD Radeon R5 A255 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 A255 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1200MHz vs 940MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 A255
0.721 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +240%
2.458 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Apr 2020
All-In-One
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
940 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.520 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
22.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
721.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
TU117
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy