Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS

AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 M255 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock940MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
376 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 M255 +3177%
0.721 TFLOPS
GeForce 9200M GS
0.022 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2014
Release Date
Jun 2008
Gem System
Generation
GeForce 9M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
940 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
384
Shading Units
8
24
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.520 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
22.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.200 GTexel/s
721.9 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
721.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
45.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
13W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
G98
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
GPU Variant
NB9M-GE
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy