Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs AMD FirePro M4100

AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs AMD FirePro M4100

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 and 2GB VRAM FirePro M4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 M255 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock940MHz
AMD FirePro M4100 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 M255 +40%
0.721 TFLOPS
FirePro M4100
0.514 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2014
Release Date
Oct 2013
Gem System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
940 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.520 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.360 GPixel/s
22.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.08 GTexel/s
721.9 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
721.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
514.6 GFLOPS
45.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.16 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
Mars
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
GPU Variant
Mars M2 PRO/LP (216-0842009)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy