Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 58% (1485MHz vs 940MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 M255
0.721 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile +321%
3.041 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2014
Release Date
Apr 2020
Gem System
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
1350 MHz
940 MHz
Boost Clock
1485 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.520 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.52 GPixel/s
22.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.04 GTexel/s
721.9 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.083 TFLOPS
721.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.041 TFLOPS
45.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
TU116
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
GPU Variant
N18P-G61
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy