Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs AMD Radeon E9260 MXM

AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs AMD Radeon E9260 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9260 MXM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1200MHz vs 940MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 M255
0.721 TFLOPS
Radeon E9260 MXM +198%
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2014
Release Date
Sep 2016
Gem System
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
1090 MHz
940 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
14
384
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.520 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
22.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
721.9 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
721.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
45.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
Baffin
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
GPU Variant
Baffin PRO
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
3 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy