Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD FirePro S10000

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD FirePro S10000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Lower TDP (30W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (950MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 +582%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Nov 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1792
20
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Tahiti
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
Zaphod
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy