Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD FirePro S9050

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD FirePro S9050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
FirePro S9050 +546%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Aug 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1792
20
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Tahiti
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy