Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs ATI FirePro V3750

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs ATI FirePro V3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
Lower TDP (30W vs 48W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240 +41%
0.499 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Sep 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
4
320
Shading Units
320
20
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
RV730
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
48W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy