Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs ATI FirePro V3800

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
Lower TDP (30W vs 43W)
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
80 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800 +4%
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Apr 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
5
320
Shading Units
400
20
TMUs
20
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Redwood
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
43W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy