Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs ATI FirePro V7900

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 +271%
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
May 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1280
20
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Cayman
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy