Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs ATI FirePro V8700

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs ATI FirePro V8700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 151W)
ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (108.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700 +140%
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Sep 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
800
20
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
151W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
RV770
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy