AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 49W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
+85%
0.499 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 620
0.269 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
May 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
320
Shading Units
96
20
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
49W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
GF108
Oland PRO
(215-0837015)
GPU Variant
GF108-100-KB-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
