Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +1500%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Mar 2016
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
4096
20
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy