Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 16GB VRAM Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 246% (2700MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU +1562%
8.294 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jun 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Console GPU(ASUS)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
-

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
2700 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
768
20
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.59 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.294 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
518.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Phoenix
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
25.39 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
178 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy