Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
176 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (38.40GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240 +20%
0.499 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
0.415 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Apr 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1536MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
320
Shading Units
144
20
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.28 GTexel/s
-
-
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
GF116
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
GF116-150-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy