Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 205W)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 162% (2040MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5700X +1992%
10.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Dec 2019
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
1243 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2560
20
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.6 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
326.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.89 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.44 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
652.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
205W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Navi 10
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy