Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 113% (1665MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 +497%
2.984 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Apr 2019
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
320
Shading Units
896
20
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
TU117
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy