Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (888MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand +310%
2.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Aug 2013
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
823 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
888 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1152
20
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.31 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.25 GTexel/s
-
-
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.046 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
85.25 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
GK104
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
GK104-200-KD-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy