Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA P106 090

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA P106 090

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 3GB VRAM P106 090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
NVIDIA P106 090 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 96% (1531MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
P106 090 +371%
2.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jul 2017
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
1354 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.2GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
320
Shading Units
768
20
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
73.49 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
73.49 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.74 GFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.352 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
73.49 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
GP106
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
GP106-090-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy