Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 200W)
ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240 +29%
0.499 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Dec 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
320
20
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

30W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
R600
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy