Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition +474%
2.867 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Mar 2013
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Southern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1792
20
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.867 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
716.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Tahiti
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy