Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 475W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 121% (1720MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega II +2723%
14.09 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jun 2019
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
1574 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
806 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
825.3GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
4096
20
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
475W
200 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Vega 20
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy