Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 70W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 118% (1700MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7500 +2342%
12.19 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Aug 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1344 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
172.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1792
20
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
190.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.37 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.19 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
380.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Navi 33
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
Navi 33
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy