Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon R7 360

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon R7 360

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (1050MHz vs 780MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360 +223%
1.613 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jun 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
768
20
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Tobago
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy