Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD FireStream 9250

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250 +100%
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jun 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
800
20
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
RV770
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy