Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R9 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 260 OEM +294%
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Dec 2013
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
896
20
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
85W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Bonaire
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
Bonaire XT (215-0839039)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy