AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
336 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
+497%
0.806 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 520 OEM
0.135 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Aug 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
384
Shading Units
48
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
134.6 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.22 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
29W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
GF119
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
GF119 B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
