AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 550
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 65W)
Score
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Apr 2006
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.440 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.880 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
65W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
NV43
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
NV43 GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
110 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0
