AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs Moore Threads MTT S3000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S3000
+1830%
15.56 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
22 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
