AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 8800 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 220W)
AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 131% (2430MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.1GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 8800 XT
+2370%
19.91 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Navi IV(RX 8000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1295 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
2430 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2438 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
624.1GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
64
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
233.3 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
622.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.81 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.91 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
622.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
220W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
Navi 48
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
Unknown
77 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
