AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 103% (2130MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1388%
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Feb 2024
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
384
Shading Units
2816
24
TMUs
88
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
AD107
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
