AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 24GB VRAM TITAN RTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 280W)
NVIDIA TITAN RTX 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 69% (1770MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
4224 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
TITAN RTX
+1923%
16.31 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Dec 2018
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1350 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
72
384
Shading Units
4608
24
TMUs
288
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
509.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.62 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.31 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
509.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
280W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
TU102
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
TU102-400-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
