Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD FireStream 9250

AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250 +39%
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jun 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
800
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
716.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
RV770
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy