Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
296 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 171W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 +33%
0.717 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Nov 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
512
Shading Units
216
32
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
716.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
171W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GT200B
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy