Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285 +358%
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Sep 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
716.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
190W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Tonga
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
5 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy