Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD Radeon RX 590

AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD Radeon RX 590

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX 590 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 590 +892%
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Nov 2018
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1469 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
2304
32
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.44 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.119 TFLOPS
716.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
445.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
175W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Polaris 30
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
Polaris 30 XT (215-0922006)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy