Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT

AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 8800 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 220W)
AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock2430MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 8800 XT +2676%
19.91 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Navi IV(RX 8000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1295 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2430 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2438 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
624.1GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
64
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
233.3 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
622.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.81 TFLOPS
716.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.91 TFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
622.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
220W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Navi 48
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
Unknown
123 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy